U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

AM Bench 2022 challenge Macroscale Tensile Tests at Different Orientations (CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO)

Additively manufactured (AM) laser powder bed fusion (PBF-L) Inconel 625 blocks were built with two different scan strategies: XY and X-only.  96 tensile specimens were extracted from blocks at different tensile axis orientations with respect to the build direction to yield the following conditions: XY scan strategy (0, 30, 45, 60, and 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction) and X-only scan strategy (0, 60, 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction).  Tensile testing was performed at room temperature using a quasistatic strain rate of 0.001/s to failure.  Microstructure was measured using x-ray computed tomography (XRCT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques on representative specimens of each scan strategy.  Large-area electron backscatter diffraction was used to measure crystallographic texture and grain size/morphology for three orthogonal planes.  Backscatter electron imaging was used to characterize the subgrain structure and assess recast layer thickness from electric discharge machining.  Electron channeling contrast imaging was used to estimate dislocation density.  XRCT was used to analyze the pore population.  Literature sources were used to estimate phase fraction, residual stress, and the single crystal C-tensor.  All processing details, specimen preparation details, tensile test method details, and microstructure measurements are provided for both XY and X-only scan strategies. Additionally, true stress strain curves for all XY-scan strategy, 0 degree orientation specimens are provided.  Predictions are requested for the bulk/continuum stress strain behavior of as-built Inconel 625 tensile specimens at different orientations (XY-scan strategy 30, 45, 60, 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction) and scan strategy (X-only scan strategy 0, 60, and 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction).

About this Dataset

Updated: 2024-02-22
Metadata Last Updated: 2022-03-25 00:00:00
Date Created: N/A
Views:
Data Provided by:
AM Bench
Dataset Owner: N/A

Access this data

Contact dataset owner Landing Page URL
Download URL
Table representation of structured data
Title AM Bench 2022 challenge Macroscale Tensile Tests at Different Orientations (CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO)
Description Additively manufactured (AM) laser powder bed fusion (PBF-L) Inconel 625 blocks were built with two different scan strategies: XY and X-only.  96 tensile specimens were extracted from blocks at different tensile axis orientations with respect to the build direction to yield the following conditions: XY scan strategy (0, 30, 45, 60, and 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction) and X-only scan strategy (0, 60, 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction).  Tensile testing was performed at room temperature using a quasistatic strain rate of 0.001/s to failure.  Microstructure was measured using x-ray computed tomography (XRCT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques on representative specimens of each scan strategy.  Large-area electron backscatter diffraction was used to measure crystallographic texture and grain size/morphology for three orthogonal planes.  Backscatter electron imaging was used to characterize the subgrain structure and assess recast layer thickness from electric discharge machining.  Electron channeling contrast imaging was used to estimate dislocation density.  XRCT was used to analyze the pore population.  Literature sources were used to estimate phase fraction, residual stress, and the single crystal C-tensor.  All processing details, specimen preparation details, tensile test method details, and microstructure measurements are provided for both XY and X-only scan strategies. Additionally, true stress strain curves for all XY-scan strategy, 0 degree orientation specimens are provided.  Predictions are requested for the bulk/continuum stress strain behavior of as-built Inconel 625 tensile specimens at different orientations (XY-scan strategy 30, 45, 60, 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction) and scan strategy (X-only scan strategy 0, 60, and 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction).
Modified 2022-03-25 00:00:00
Publisher Name National Institute of Standards and Technology
Contact mailto:nik.hrabe@nist.gov
Keywords AM Bench , benchmark , additive manufacturing , metal , mechanical characterization , microstructure characterization
{
    "identifier": "ark:\/88434\/mds2-2588",
    "accessLevel": "public",
    "contactPoint": {
        "hasEmail": "mailto:nik.hrabe@nist.gov",
        "fn": "Nik Hrabe"
    },
    "programCode": [
        "006:045"
    ],
    "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
    "landingPage": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/id\/mds2-2588",
    "description": "Additively manufactured (AM) laser powder bed fusion (PBF-L) Inconel 625 blocks were built with two different scan strategies: XY and X-only.\u00a0 96 tensile specimens were extracted from blocks at different tensile axis orientations with respect to the build direction to yield the following conditions: XY scan strategy (0, 30, 45, 60, and 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction) and X-only scan strategy (0, 60, 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction).\u00a0 Tensile testing was performed at room temperature using a quasistatic strain rate of 0.001\/s to failure.\u00a0 Microstructure was measured using x-ray computed tomography (XRCT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques on representative specimens of each scan strategy.\u00a0 Large-area electron backscatter diffraction was used to measure crystallographic texture and grain size\/morphology for three orthogonal planes.\u00a0 Backscatter electron imaging was used to characterize the subgrain structure and assess recast layer thickness from electric discharge machining.\u00a0 Electron channeling contrast imaging was used to estimate dislocation density.\u00a0 XRCT was used to analyze the pore population.\u00a0 Literature sources were used to estimate phase fraction, residual stress, and the single crystal C-tensor.\u00a0\u00a0All processing details, specimen preparation details, tensile test method details, and microstructure measurements are provided for both XY and X-only scan strategies. Additionally, true stress strain curves for all XY-scan strategy, 0 degree orientation specimens are provided.\u00a0 Predictions are requested for the bulk\/continuum stress strain behavior of as-built Inconel 625 tensile specimens at different orientations (XY-scan strategy 30, 45, 60, 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction) and scan strategy (X-only scan strategy 0, 60, and 90 degree orientation w.r.t. build direction).",
    "language": [
        "en"
    ],
    "title": "AM Bench 2022 challenge Macroscale Tensile Tests at Different Orientations (CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO)",
    "distribution": [
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/ark:\/88434\/mds2-2588\/Macroscale_CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO.zip",
            "mediaType": "application\/zip"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/ark:\/88434\/mds2-2588\/Macroscale_CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO.zip.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/ark:\/88434\/mds2-2588\/prediction%20template_CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO.xlsx",
            "mediaType": "application\/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/ark:\/88434\/mds2-2588\/prediction%20template_CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO.xlsx.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/ark:\/88434\/mds2-2588\/read%20me_CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO.pdf",
            "mediaType": "application\/pdf"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/ark:\/88434\/mds2-2588\/read%20me_CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO.pdf.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2588\/ANSWERS%20Macroscale_CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO.zip",
            "description": "answers for AM Bench 2022 challenge CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO",
            "mediaType": "application\/x-zip-compressed",
            "title": "ANSWERS Macroscale_CHAL-AMB2022-04-MaTTO"
        }
    ],
    "license": "https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/open\/license",
    "bureauCode": [
        "006:55"
    ],
    "modified": "2022-03-25 00:00:00",
    "publisher": {
        "@type": "org:Organization",
        "name": "National Institute of Standards and Technology"
    },
    "accrualPeriodicity": "irregular",
    "theme": [
        "Manufacturing:Additive manufacturing",
        "Materials:Metals",
        "Materials:Materials characterization",
        "Materials:Modeling and computational material science",
        "Standards:Reference data"
    ],
    "issued": "2022-04-11",
    "keyword": [
        "AM Bench",
        "benchmark",
        "additive manufacturing",
        "metal",
        "mechanical characterization",
        "microstructure characterization"
    ]
}

Was this page helpful?