U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

GAA-GAA Coexistence in the CBRS Band: Performance Evaluation of Approach 3

The General Authorized Access (GAA) users in the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band are the lowest priority users. They must cooperate with each other to minimize mutual interference and increase spectrum utilization. The Wireless Innovation Forum (WInnForum), a standardization body, has recommended three schemes to address this GAA-GAA coexistence issue. This dataset contains the performance data obtained from simulation experiments run to evaluate the performance of the WInnForum scheme called "Approach 3". Various performance graphs using this dataset has been published in the publication titled "GAA-GAA Coexistence in the CBRS Band: Performance Evaluation of Approach 3" which appeared in the IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) 2020.

About this Dataset

Updated: 2024-02-22
Metadata Last Updated: 2020-05-15 00:00:00
Date Created: N/A
Views:
Data Provided by:
CBRS
Dataset Owner: N/A

Access this data

Contact dataset owner Landing Page URL
Download URL
Table representation of structured data
Title GAA-GAA Coexistence in the CBRS Band: Performance Evaluation of Approach 3
Description The General Authorized Access (GAA) users in the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band are the lowest priority users. They must cooperate with each other to minimize mutual interference and increase spectrum utilization. The Wireless Innovation Forum (WInnForum), a standardization body, has recommended three schemes to address this GAA-GAA coexistence issue. This dataset contains the performance data obtained from simulation experiments run to evaluate the performance of the WInnForum scheme called "Approach 3". Various performance graphs using this dataset has been published in the publication titled "GAA-GAA Coexistence in the CBRS Band: Performance Evaluation of Approach 3" which appeared in the IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) 2020.
Modified 2020-05-15 00:00:00
Publisher Name National Institute of Standards and Technology
Contact mailto:[email protected]
Keywords CBRS , 3.5 GHz , GAA , Coexistence , WInnForum , Approach 3
{
    "identifier": "ark:\/88434\/mds2-2346",
    "accessLevel": "public",
    "contactPoint": {
        "hasEmail": "mailto:[email protected]",
        "fn": "Anirudha Sahoo"
    },
    "programCode": [
        "006:045"
    ],
    "@type": "dcat:Dataset",
    "landingPage": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/id\/mds2-2346",
    "description": "The General Authorized Access (GAA) users in the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band are the lowest priority users. They must cooperate with each other to minimize mutual interference and increase spectrum utilization. The Wireless Innovation Forum (WInnForum), a standardization body, has recommended three schemes to address this GAA-GAA coexistence issue.  This dataset contains the performance data obtained from simulation experiments run to evaluate the performance of the WInnForum scheme called \"Approach 3\".  Various performance graphs using this dataset has been published in the publication titled \"GAA-GAA Coexistence in the CBRS Band: Performance Evaluation of Approach 3\" which appeared in the IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) 2020.",
    "language": [
        "en"
    ],
    "title": "GAA-GAA Coexistence in the CBRS Band: Performance Evaluation of Approach 3",
    "distribution": [
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_2.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for coverage ratio vs deployment density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_2.txt",
            "format": "this file is in ASCII text format",
            "description": "This data shows the variation of coverage ratio in San Diego and Virginia Beach as deployment density changes (for both ITM and Hybrid propagation models)",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "coverage ratio vs deployment density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_3.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for Coverage Ratio vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_3.txt",
            "format": "ASCII text",
            "description": "This data shows the variation of coverage ratio in San Diego and Virginia Beach as deployment density changes (for both ITM and Hybrid propagation models) when number of Coexistence Groups = 4",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "Coverage Ratio vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_4.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for Average Maximum Allocable Bandwidth of CBSDs in a CxG vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_4.txt",
            "format": "ASCII text",
            "description": "This data shows the variation of Average Maximum Allocable Bandwidth of CBSDs in a CxG (AMABCC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach as deployment density changes (for both ITM and Hybrid propagation models) when number of Coexistence Groups = 3",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "Average Maximum Allocable Bandwidth of CBSDs in a CxG vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_5.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for Average Maximum Allocable Bandwidth of CBSDs in a CxG vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_5.txt",
            "format": "ASCII text",
            "description": "This data shows the variation of Average Maximum Allocable Bandwidth of CBSDs in a CxG (AMABCC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach as deployment density changes (for both ITM and Hybrid propagation models) when number of Coexistence Groups = 4",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "Average Maximum Allocable Bandwidth of CBSDs in a CxG vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_6.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for Ratio of inter-CxG Interfered Area of a CxG (RCIAC) vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_6.txt",
            "format": "ASCII text",
            "description": "variation of Ratio of inter-CxG Interfered Area of a CxG (RCIAC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach (for both ITM and Hybrid models) as deployment density changes when the number of CxGs=3",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "Ratio of inter-CxG Interfered Area of a CxG (RCIAC) vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_7.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for Ratio of inter-CxG Interfered Area of a CxG (RCIAC) vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_7.txt",
            "format": "ASCII text",
            "description": "variation of Ratio of inter-CxG Interfered Area of a CxG (RCIAC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach (for both ITM and Hybrid models) as deployment density changes when the number of CxGs=4",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "Ratio of inter-CxG Interfered Area of a CxG (RCIAC) vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_8.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for Average Aggregate Interference per inter-CxG Interfered Grid of a CxG (AAICIGC)  vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_8.txt",
            "format": "ASCII text",
            "description": "variation of Average Aggregate Interference per inter-CxG Interfered Grid of a CxG (AAICIGC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach (for both ITM and Hybrid models) as deployment density varies when the number of CxGs = 3",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "Average Aggregate Interference per inter-CxG Interfered Grid of a CxG (AAICIGC)  vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_9.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for Average Aggregate Interference per inter-CxG Interfered Grid of a CxG (AAICIGC) vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_9.txt",
            "format": "ASCII text",
            "description": "variation of Average Aggregate Interference per inter-CxG Interfered Grid of a CxG (AAICIGC) in San Diego and Virginia Beach (for both ITM and Hybrid models) as deployment density varies when the number of CxGs = 4",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "Average Aggregate Interference per inter-CxG Interfered Grid of a CxG (AAICIGC) vs Deployment Density"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_10.txt.sha256",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "SHA256 File for distribution of Inter-CxG Edge Weights"
        },
        {
            "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2346\/figure_10.txt",
            "format": "ASCII text",
            "description": "Distribution of Inter-CxG Edge Weights of all CBSDs in CxG_0 when deployment density = 10 CBSD\/square km, propagation model=ITM and number of CxGs=4",
            "mediaType": "text\/plain",
            "title": "distribution of Inter-CxG Edge Weights"
        },
        {
            "accessURL": "https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18434\/mds2-2346",
            "title": "DOI Access for GAA-GAA Coexistence in the CBRS Band: Performance Evaluation of Approach 3"
        }
    ],
    "license": "https:\/\/www.nist.gov\/open\/license",
    "bureauCode": [
        "006:55"
    ],
    "modified": "2020-05-15 00:00:00",
    "publisher": {
        "@type": "org:Organization",
        "name": "National Institute of Standards and Technology"
    },
    "theme": [
        "Advanced Communications:Wireless (RF)",
        "Information Technology:Networking"
    ],
    "issued": "2021-01-05",
    "keyword": [
        "CBRS",
        "3.5 GHz",
        "GAA",
        "Coexistence",
        "WInnForum",
        "Approach 3"
    ]
}

Was this page helpful?