Non-rigid 3D objects are commonly seen in our surroundings. However, previous efforts have been mainly devoted to the retrieval of rigid 3D models, and thus comparing non-rigid 3D shapes is still a challenging problem in content-based 3D object retrieval. Therefore, we organize this track to promote the development of non-rigid 3D shape retrieval.
The objective of this track is to evaluate the performance of 3D shape retrieval approaches on the subset of a publicly available non-rigid 3D models database----McGill Articulated Shape Benchmark database.
Task description: The task is to evaluate the dissimilarity between every two objects in the database and then output the dissimilarity matrix.
Data set: The McGill Articulated Shape Benchmark database consists of 255 non-rigid 3D models which are classified into 10 categories. The maximum number of the objects in a class is 31, while the minimum number is 20.
200 models are selected (or modified) to generate our test database to ensure that every class contains equal number of models. The models are represented as watertight triangle meshes and the file format is selected as the ASCII Object File Format (*.off). The original database is publicly available on the website: http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~shape/benchMark/
Evaluation Methodology: We will employ the following evaluation measures: Precision-Recall curve; Average Precision (AP) and Mean Average Precision (MAP); E-Measure; Discounted Cumulative Gain; Nearest Neighbor, First-Tier (Tier1) and Second-Tier (Tier2).
Please Cite the paper: SHREC'10 Track: Non-rigid 3D Shape Retrieval., Z. Lian, A. Godil, T. Fabry, T. Furuya, J. Hermans, R. Ohbuchi, C. Shu, D. Smeets, P. Suetens, D. Vandermeulen, S. Wuhrer
In: M. Daoudi, T. Schreck, M. Spagnuolo, I. Pratikakis, R. Veltkamp (eds.), Proceedings of the Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on 3D Object Retrieval, 2010.
About this Dataset
Title | SHREC'10 Track: Non-rigid 3D Shape Retrieval |
---|---|
Description | Non-rigid 3D objects are commonly seen in our surroundings. However, previous efforts have been mainly devoted to the retrieval of rigid 3D models, and thus comparing non-rigid 3D shapes is still a challenging problem in content-based 3D object retrieval. Therefore, we organize this track to promote the development of non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. The objective of this track is to evaluate the performance of 3D shape retrieval approaches on the subset of a publicly available non-rigid 3D models database----McGill Articulated Shape Benchmark database. Task description: The task is to evaluate the dissimilarity between every two objects in the database and then output the dissimilarity matrix. Data set: The McGill Articulated Shape Benchmark database consists of 255 non-rigid 3D models which are classified into 10 categories. The maximum number of the objects in a class is 31, while the minimum number is 20. 200 models are selected (or modified) to generate our test database to ensure that every class contains equal number of models. The models are represented as watertight triangle meshes and the file format is selected as the ASCII Object File Format (*.off). The original database is publicly available on the website: http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/~shape/benchMark/ Evaluation Methodology: We will employ the following evaluation measures: Precision-Recall curve; Average Precision (AP) and Mean Average Precision (MAP); E-Measure; Discounted Cumulative Gain; Nearest Neighbor, First-Tier (Tier1) and Second-Tier (Tier2). Please Cite the paper: SHREC'10 Track: Non-rigid 3D Shape Retrieval., Z. Lian, A. Godil, T. Fabry, T. Furuya, J. Hermans, R. Ohbuchi, C. Shu, D. Smeets, P. Suetens, D. Vandermeulen, S. Wuhrer In: M. Daoudi, T. Schreck, M. Spagnuolo, I. Pratikakis, R. Veltkamp (eds.), Proceedings of the Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on 3D Object Retrieval, 2010. |
Modified | 2010-02-02 00:00:00 |
Publisher Name | National Institute of Standards and Technology |
Contact | mailto:[email protected] |
Keywords | Nonrigid 3D Shape Retrieval , Nonrigid 3D Models , 3D Shape Analysis |
{ "identifier": "ark:\/88434\/mds2-2212", "accessLevel": "public", "contactPoint": { "hasEmail": "mailto:[email protected]", "fn": "Afzal A. Godil" }, "programCode": [ "006:045" ], "landingPage": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/id\/mds2-2212", "title": "SHREC'10 Track: Non-rigid 3D Shape Retrieval", "description": "Non-rigid 3D objects are commonly seen in our surroundings. However, previous efforts have been mainly devoted to the retrieval of rigid 3D models, and thus comparing non-rigid 3D shapes is still a challenging problem in content-based 3D object retrieval. Therefore, we organize this track to promote the development of non-rigid 3D shape retrieval.\n\nThe objective of this track is to evaluate the performance of 3D shape retrieval approaches on the subset of a publicly available non-rigid 3D models database----McGill Articulated Shape Benchmark database.\n\nTask description: The task is to evaluate the dissimilarity between every two objects in the database and then output the dissimilarity matrix.\n\nData set: The McGill Articulated Shape Benchmark database consists of 255 non-rigid 3D models which are classified into 10 categories. The maximum number of the objects in a class is 31, while the minimum number is 20.\n200 models are selected (or modified) to generate our test database to ensure that every class contains equal number of models. The models are represented as watertight triangle meshes and the file format is selected as the ASCII Object File Format (*.off). The original database is publicly available on the website: http:\/\/www.cim.mcgill.ca\/~shape\/benchMark\/\n\nEvaluation Methodology: We will employ the following evaluation measures: Precision-Recall curve; Average Precision (AP) and Mean Average Precision (MAP); E-Measure; Discounted Cumulative Gain; Nearest Neighbor, First-Tier (Tier1) and Second-Tier (Tier2).\n\nPlease Cite the paper: SHREC'10 Track: Non-rigid 3D Shape Retrieval., Z. Lian, A. Godil, T. Fabry, T. Furuya, J. Hermans, R. Ohbuchi, C. Shu, D. Smeets, P. Suetens, D. Vandermeulen, S. Wuhrer \nIn: M. Daoudi, T. Schreck, M. Spagnuolo, I. Pratikakis, R. Veltkamp (eds.), Proceedings of the Eurographics\/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on 3D Object Retrieval, 2010.\n", "language": [ "en" ], "distribution": [ { "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2212\/SHREC2011_NonRigid.zip.sha256", "mediaType": "text\/plain", "title": "SHA256 File for SHREC'10 Track: Non-rigid 3D Shape Retrieval" }, { "downloadURL": "https:\/\/data.nist.gov\/od\/ds\/mds2-2212\/SHREC2011_NonRigid.zip", "description": "3D Models, Classification file, Images", "mediaType": "application\/zip", "title": "SHREC'10 Track: Non-rigid 3D Shape Retrieval" }, { "accessURL": "https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18434\/M32212", "title": "DOI Access for SHREC'10 Track: Non-rigid 3D Shape Retrieval" } ], "bureauCode": [ "006:55" ], "modified": "2010-02-02 00:00:00", "publisher": { "@type": "org:Organization", "name": "National Institute of Standards and Technology" }, "theme": [ "Mathematics and Statistics:Image and signal processing", "Information Technology:Data and informatics" ], "keyword": [ "Nonrigid 3D Shape Retrieval", "Nonrigid 3D Models", "3D Shape Analysis" ] }